Greens Senator Richard Di Natale wants a
senate inquiry into drugs in sport. He wants leading players and coaching staff
from the AFL and NRL to appear and explain how it could have happened. He’s
right, they should.
When the ASADA
investigation exploded in the media my first response was, “Suffer, scumbag
hypocrites”. It seemed like vindication. I and some of the best people I know
are viewed as filth by much of society. We will always – no matter what we do
to improve ourselves – be defined by what we once did to assuage appalling
emotional and psychological damage. Accordingly, every time we let someone new
into our lives we face an uncomfortable decision: whether to be honest or lie
about a mistake we can’t un-make.
And now here
came the nation’s sporting heroes, held up as models of virtue for children to
emulate, showered with money, adulation and all the privileges afforded by
fame, revealed at last as the cheating thugs some of us have always known them
to be.
I was long
ago disabused of any romantic notions about footballers or cricketers – fifteen
years in Kings Cross, watching them get drunk or wired, start fights, abuse
women and generally be obnoxious, took care of that. This recovering junkie
felt good knowing the rest of the country finally gets it too. Unlike the rape
scandals a couple of years ago, this time there would be no excuses.
But I’ve had
some time to think. Senator Di Natale’s proposed inquiry is so important
precisely because the drug issue highlights many of the same institutional
problems that produced those ugly sex stories.
Take a
seventeen-year-old from the suburbs or the bush. Put him in a situation where
his only job is to turn up at training and at the game on the weekend; where
he’s the subject of hero-worship disproportionate to his actual accomplishment;
where he rarely hears the word ‘no’; and where, so long as he keeps winning,
his most outrageous behaviour will be excused or covered-up. It doesn’t take a
genius to predict the likely result.
Football, by
its nature, is a community. A few
leaders come to the fore; the rest are followers. That same seventeen-year-old
will be impressionable. He will cast about for role-models. He will accept as
normal whatever the coach, officials or prominent players do or say. If he’s
told, ‘Take this “supplement”’ – he probably will, whatever his qualms.
A senate
inquiry should hear those stories. Not to excuse them – most drug users have an
external locus of control; given a chance to blame someone else they will – but
to expose the complexities of the issue. It should be more than a public skewering
of the end-users and their suppliers.
The players
need a chance to take responsibility for their actions; the clubs and governing
bodies need to be exposed in their complicity; it needs to be addressed as a
cultural issue, not the misbehaviour of a few rogue individuals or clubs.
And along the way maybe, just maybe, we’ll
stumble over a more compassionate, more realistic understanding of the drug
problem in the wider community.
Or not ...
No comments:
Post a Comment