I’ve written before that the best portrait in
literature of high-functioning autism is Sherlock and Mycroft Holmes*. I may
have been wrong. I think I’ve found a better one in another book; actually, in the book – it’s God.
Think
about it. He’s bright, brilliant and creative. When we first meet him he’s so
obsessed with his current project that he works for six solid days before
collapsing on the seventh.
He’s
enigmatic. Although he can be great company when he wants to be, often he’s
just hard to get along with. He invents bizarre little rituals that he insists
everybody around him follow. Failure to do so results in fearsome tantrums – either
he melts down and destroys everything in sight, or shuts down and doesn’t say a
word for centuries on end.
Nobody’s
ever quite sure what sets him off.
It’s
not that he doesn’t want to interact
with people. In fact, he craves it. He’s desperate to love and be loved; he’s
just not sure how. Try as he might, it always goes subtly, horribly wrong. He’s
convinced he’s always perfectly reasonable – why don’t these people get him?
The
problem is he empathises better if he’s actually been in the other person’s
shoes. Thankfully he’s blessed with the ability to think in unusual ways, and
to stubbornly apply himself to a problem until it’s solved. So, after a couple
of thousand years mulling it over, the answer dawns: You want to get along with
humans? Then, be a human.
Applying
that gift for lateral thinking again, he not only gets around the need for sex
in conception, but also becomes his own father (let’s see you do that).
As
you might expect, he’s a strange, serious child. He causes his parents no end
of worry – vanishing on a trip to the city, only to turn up lecturing people at
the Temple steps.
The
familiar pattern continues into manhood. Some love him; others hate him; few
are indifferent to him; nobody gets him: is he really this way, or is he taking the piss? Was that a joke? Why
does he talk for so long, and so impenetrably? What the hell does he mean? And where does he get to when he
disappears for hours or days at a time?
One thing’s
for sure: he has an idea of himself, and he takes it very seriously. So seriously that it gets him killed. He doesn’t
deal well with authority – civil or religious.
Since his
little sojourn among us he’s mellowed a bit. No more smiting. He still engages
in interminable monologues on ideas he finds interesting; but he generally
limits himself to speaking at people nearly as odd as he is himself.
And still,
nobody can agree on exactly what he’s saying.
No Sherlock
Holmes, but it’s a compelling portrait, eh? Precisely what questions it answers
regarding a Creator – benevolent, omniscient, absent or otherwise – I can’t
really say.
But it might
just tell us something about the guys who wrote the book ....
*The
Diogenes Club, 30 August 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment